[michaelgrosner2]

None, because the government shouldn’t be interfering in speech.

[Dig1t]

The whole point of this is that government is already interfering in speech.

This one specifically is pretty strong IMO (Biden team telling Twitter to manipulate speech): https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1598827602403160064

Yes yes, someone has already said something about one of them being a dick pic, remove that one, whatever. But do you think they are ALL dick picks? This email is one out of many.

[sanderjd]

The point being made by the commenter you replied to, which I think you missed, is that if the government passed a law preventing one private entity (a political campaign) from emailing another private entity (a business), that would be government interference in speech.

[michaelgrosner2]

> This one specifically is pretty strong IMO

That was from October 2020. Biden was not in government then.

[tomrod]

> The whole point of this is that government is already interfering in speech.

Nah. The point of this is right-wing propaganda.