top | item 33853286 (no title) throwaway5Am1k | 3 years ago >I know many intelligent people who absolutely hate the opposite party.Intelligent or simply well educated? discuss order hn newest swayvil|3 years ago Or well spoken. It's amazing how intelligent you sound when you talk good. giantg2|3 years ago I have the opposite problem. I speak western Pennsylvanian. "There's patches of slippy ice down by the crick." therealdrag0|3 years ago Reminds me of the YouTube video where participants had to rank each others intelligence. And the person who sorta took a leadership role in the socializing ended up being lower and some of the more jar-head types were pretty high if not highest. load replies (1) giantg2|3 years ago In many cases, both. But there are a few that didn't go to higher education. psychphysic|3 years ago You're applying a logically fallacy here.For every vocal critic there are many more tolerant silent critics.I.e. your sample is skewed if you think about the people who "hate" the other side.Instead you need to sample the entire population the most tolerant won't even be voting or keeping an eye on politics.Please note, Ive only read the title not the article. I'm just that damn high IQ and tolerant. load replies (1) adam_arthur|3 years ago Usually its the latter rather than the former
swayvil|3 years ago Or well spoken. It's amazing how intelligent you sound when you talk good. giantg2|3 years ago I have the opposite problem. I speak western Pennsylvanian. "There's patches of slippy ice down by the crick." therealdrag0|3 years ago Reminds me of the YouTube video where participants had to rank each others intelligence. And the person who sorta took a leadership role in the socializing ended up being lower and some of the more jar-head types were pretty high if not highest. load replies (1)
giantg2|3 years ago I have the opposite problem. I speak western Pennsylvanian. "There's patches of slippy ice down by the crick."
therealdrag0|3 years ago Reminds me of the YouTube video where participants had to rank each others intelligence. And the person who sorta took a leadership role in the socializing ended up being lower and some of the more jar-head types were pretty high if not highest. load replies (1)
giantg2|3 years ago In many cases, both. But there are a few that didn't go to higher education. psychphysic|3 years ago You're applying a logically fallacy here.For every vocal critic there are many more tolerant silent critics.I.e. your sample is skewed if you think about the people who "hate" the other side.Instead you need to sample the entire population the most tolerant won't even be voting or keeping an eye on politics.Please note, Ive only read the title not the article. I'm just that damn high IQ and tolerant. load replies (1)
psychphysic|3 years ago You're applying a logically fallacy here.For every vocal critic there are many more tolerant silent critics.I.e. your sample is skewed if you think about the people who "hate" the other side.Instead you need to sample the entire population the most tolerant won't even be voting or keeping an eye on politics.Please note, Ive only read the title not the article. I'm just that damn high IQ and tolerant. load replies (1)
swayvil|3 years ago
giantg2|3 years ago
therealdrag0|3 years ago
giantg2|3 years ago
psychphysic|3 years ago
For every vocal critic there are many more tolerant silent critics.
I.e. your sample is skewed if you think about the people who "hate" the other side.
Instead you need to sample the entire population the most tolerant won't even be voting or keeping an eye on politics.
Please note, Ive only read the title not the article. I'm just that damn high IQ and tolerant.
adam_arthur|3 years ago