[Navarr]

There's a good difference between the two things, actually.

What I believe this Lawsuit is alleging is that CVS promised ADA that they would give them $10m, and CVS is saying that customer donations are part of that $10m.

The other aspect is the tax aspect. What people are concerned about is that a company is profiting off their "donation" which cannot happen, even if they are merely reimbursing themselves.

* Company donates $10 and so does not have to pay the income tax * Customer donates $10 through company. This is $10 of income to the company, which requires the income tax.

In such a scenario, the company gets no financial benefit - though they may get a social benefit in what they're claiming to donate