top | item 33870746

(no title)

stu2010 | 3 years ago

I haven't seen much discussion about how AM gets used for local road condition or emergency communication. When you're driving and see a sign that says "TUNE TO 1610 AM" and the car has no AM receiver, what do you do?

This may be a shrinking niche, but it's potentially a last bastion of AM radio usefulness.

discuss

order

RF_Enthusiast|3 years ago

Those low power highway information stations are actually required to be low quality audio [1]. My understanding is that back in the day, broadcasters insisted that these stations were low quality so they would not compete with commercial broadcasters.

In my opinion, those stations actually make AM seem much worse than it really is. That scheme backfired in the long run.

[1] 47 CFR 90.242(b)(8) <https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-47/chapter-I/subchapter-D...>

Fatnino|3 years ago

There was (is?) a commercial station in the bay area that broadcasts simultaneously on AM and FM. I could tune the car radio to the correct frequency on each and then compare the sound quality by flipping the AM/FM switch.

FM is WAY better sound quality. It's not even close.

aidenn0|3 years ago

What about sports broadcasts? I often listen to games in my car on AM.

RF_Enthusiast|3 years ago

As do many people. AM stations that run play-by-play sports programming do very well in the ratings, and do very well with the station's sales team.

Analemma_|3 years ago

In a sample size of maybe 10, every time I’ve seen one of those highway signs and tuned to the station, the quality was so bad I couldn’t make out any words and so got no useful information. If that’s the last bastion of AM usefulness, scrap it and give that spectrum to the wireless carriers. Frankly, for stuff like road closure information I’m a lot more likely to get that from Waze (delivered over a 5G connection) now anyway.

tjohns|3 years ago

The wireless carriers wouldn't be able to do anything with the AM broadcast band. It's in the MF range - not useful for cellular at all due to limited bandwidth, giant antenna requirements, and ionospheric bounce.

RF_Enthusiast|3 years ago

I don't think wireless carriers would want 1.2 MHz at that low of a frequency. They'd have the same issues with interference that broadcast stations have. The transmit antennas would take up acres of land (each element hundreds of feet long). Receiver antennas would also need to be large.

Also, very little data would fit in such a tiny spectrum window.