top | item 33916204

(no title)

IfOnlyYouKnew | 3 years ago

As I said, it’s debatable if the guy’s reach needed to be limited, the point you are arguing.

What’s not debatable is that the breathless outrage-bait under discussion misrepresented the case for limiting the Dr’s reach with a straw-man argument, and so did you.

discuss

order

indoclay|3 years ago

> misrepresented the case for limiting the Dr’s reach

Could you help me understand what the argument is that this person should have been put on any form of blacklist?