That one take on it. The other is that it could potentially save literally tens of thousands of lives. Immediately classifying a potentially life-saving medical technology is a threat to the second amendment might not be the best look for 2A advocates.
giantg2|3 years ago
This tool could be lifesaving. This tool could also be for oppression. It's valid to question the potentially harmful uses of any medical tool and the policy that surrounds them (see opioids as an example).