[ccorxi]

What most of you still supporting "vaccine" failed to understand is that a jab cannot be developed in less that 1 year. It was a huge experiment and many people paid with either their lives or have suffered severe damage. All for a virus that kill less that common influenza, which a much more dangerous corona virus than covid.

[manv1]

Actually, the vaccine was developed relatively quickly. The testing and ramp-up is what took the vast majority of time.

You're sort of following the pre operation warp speed statements that the press and "experts" were spouting before they actually did it.

But now there are vaccines for covid that are made in the standard fashion. It took them longer to get out of the gate, but they're around. Not sure if they're in the US, though.

[nwah1]

Multiple statements you made are just wrong.

There is no law of nature that says a vaccine cannot be made in a year, in the same way that there is no law of nature forbidding any of our technological artifacts that we use every day.

Influenza is not a coronavirus.

Influenza does not kill anywhere near as much as the original SARS-CoV-2 strain.

And mortality was not the only concern regarding the pandemic.

[svnt]

It never had before, because a commercial mRNA vaccine had never been the right trade off of immunity vs development time.

Until COVID-19 there had not been a pandemic we needed to address with a vaccine since mRNA vaccination tech became widespread several decades ago. If we had enough time to develop a vaccine, why sell a new one that doesn’t work as well as the old kind?