[Ferrotin]

Obviously he followed the car from the airport — how else would he identify the car with Elon Musk’s kid?

[dtjb]

we don't know anything about the "stalker" other than what Musk said. Musk has been caught lying about his children in the past [1] to justify his Twitter policy swings. I'd like to think he wouldn't stoop so low as to use his kid like that, but the truth is we don't know.

Now journalists are being banned for copying word-for-word the police response stating that "no police report was filed" over the stalker incident.

[1] https://twitter.com/justinemusk/status/1595506087570333696

[sprkwd]

There are many legitimate reasons to track Elon Musk's coordinates, for example to offer him ads more relevant to his interests.

[hcurtiss]

The kid dying in his arms or his wife’s beside him — I feel like this is not a good one to be screaming “liar.”

[monksy]

It's like journalists don't believe that anything will happen to them. The faster they divest from twitter the better.

[jjulius]

>Obviously...

We know too little about this incident to say that that is obvious at this point.

[Bud]

Please explain how the car in question was found in the first place, at an airport the size of a small city. Flight-tracking data will have been of absolutely zero help in doing that, of course.