top | item 34036609 (no title) wutwutwutwut | 3 years ago This is public information, not private. discuss order hn newest dvhh|3 years ago I think that's the defense used by most "doxxing" website. wutwutwutwut|3 years ago I wouldn't know. The person I replied to claimed that it was "private information of individuals". If it's public info by law then referring to it as private seems very misleading, wouldn't you say? load replies (1) philistine|3 years ago How about he is supremely rich, and his whereabouts are public concerns.
dvhh|3 years ago I think that's the defense used by most "doxxing" website. wutwutwutwut|3 years ago I wouldn't know. The person I replied to claimed that it was "private information of individuals". If it's public info by law then referring to it as private seems very misleading, wouldn't you say? load replies (1) philistine|3 years ago How about he is supremely rich, and his whereabouts are public concerns.
wutwutwutwut|3 years ago I wouldn't know. The person I replied to claimed that it was "private information of individuals". If it's public info by law then referring to it as private seems very misleading, wouldn't you say? load replies (1)
dvhh|3 years ago
wutwutwutwut|3 years ago
philistine|3 years ago