top | item 34042518

(no title)

andolanra | 3 years ago

Sure is lucky that the title of the post explicitly says "mostly dead" and includes a big disclaimer about how not all of them are dead, then!

discuss

order

JadeNB|3 years ago

Also, as was obscured by the title mangler, the "dead" in the title is just a side remark; the title without the parenthesis is "10 most influential programming languages", and "(ly dead)" after "most" is just a parenthesis.

dang|3 years ago

Maybe we'll just revert to the linkbaity title in this case. I had it briefly as "Mostly-dead, influential programming languages (2020)" but that probably did more harm than good.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Edit: that didn't work. I'm just going to take the whole 'dead' thing out.

ameliaquining|3 years ago

Well, it's not a claim that these are the ten most influential programming languages. Lisp was clearly more influential than most of these, but it didn't make the list because it's still alive.

I think the title was mostly just a pun/riff on the title of the other post linked in the first paragraph, which did claim to be a list of the most influential languages, and doesn't really make sense if read as a specific concrete claim.

Mountain_Skies|3 years ago

Think the author saw a way to sneak in a 'Princess Bride' reference and took it.