top | item 34065084

(no title)

zqfuz | 3 years ago

Too old, fat, physically disabled people, etc. can have a job and turn that job into petrol to feed their cars. OTOH they can't drive a bicycle. That's not very egalitarian.

discuss

order

oblio|3 years ago

> Too old

1. https://www.reddit.com/r/OldSchoolCool/comments/hycbb0/olivi...

> fat

2. See 1, up to a point. For morbidly obese people, see 1. so you don't become morbidly obese.

> physically disabled people

See 1. For serious disability, most of those people can't drive, either. More than that, cars still have their uses, so I agree. Let's promote cars PRIMARILY for seriously disabled people. Abled bodied people, public transit, bikes, foot/electric scooters.

> OTOH they can't drive a bicycle. That's not very egalitarian.

Entire countries can.

China was initially built on bikes. As was Vietnam. As is the Netherlands.

Countries which are some of the most egalitarian in the world.

Let's not pretend cars are not the middle and upper class comfortable transportation devices. Cars are very, very convenient. Convenience is amazing, but it's also a slow poison.

You can't really be morbidly obese, for example, if you don't have access to a car. I mean, you probably can, but the odds of that happening are so low it's not worth taking about that scenario.

gpvos|3 years ago

There are also people who can't drive a car for medical reasons, and I guess there are more of those. You'd have to come with actual numbers to convince me.

barnabee|3 years ago

There are electric "micromobility" options including bikes and things more suitable to physically disabled people though.

Micromobility overall is more egalitarian than the car will ever be, and better in lots of other ways too.

yread|3 years ago

But women in Saudi Arabia can cycle on their own