Be humble grandpa! There were people who used to use Google Reader without any of its social network shenanigans. And of course, there were people who have been using RSS readers before Google Reader was even born. But, no RSS reader has ever reached the ceiling of common usage, which is not a bad deal.
drtz|3 years ago
I was even blissfully ignorant to the existence of these social features in Google Reader until this moment.
unknown|3 years ago
[deleted]
kcplate|3 years ago
ghaff|3 years ago
While it's satisfying to blame Google, the killing of Reader always seemed like a natural effect of RSS not being popular than its cause. It's not like there aren't other RSS alternatives. And, of course, social media does a pretty good job--for all its faults--of surfacing those various tidbits with or without RSS.
skybrian|3 years ago
It seems hard to argue that it would have become more successful, given that its successors are pretty good but they’re small businesses.
lolinder|3 years ago
> In retrospect, it was the least toxic social network. You added your friends, their recommendations bubbled up in the interface, so you saw cool new stuff.
This is just "subscribe to people's blogs". That's still the ideal social media for me.
ryanf|3 years ago