This reminds me of that old joke "In the fall of 1972 President Nixon announced that the rate of increase of inflation was decreasing. This was the first time a sitting president used the third derivative to advance his case for reelection."
https://www.maa.org/press/periodicals/convergence/quotations...
To be clear, the article is not discussing the third derivative, but rather arguing that the standard “now versus one year ago” measure is heavily back-weighted due to factors early this past year. The second derivative is down!
Is that like how it was convenient in the 2010’s when discussing “terrorist attacks on US soul” to conveniently leave out 2001 because it was an “outlier?”
That would apply also to anyone who made a campaign issue out of some train or car being too jerky. Later examples might include the Toyota unintended acceleration?
mortenjorck|3 years ago
flandish|3 years ago
Is that like how it was convenient in the 2010’s when discussing “terrorist attacks on US soul” to conveniently leave out 2001 because it was an “outlier?”
mamediz|3 years ago
SilasX|3 years ago
Rebelgecko|3 years ago
reilly3000|3 years ago
afarrell|3 years ago
redtexture|3 years ago