[x-shadowban]

The anti-singularity, where an AI produces decreasingly correct versions of itself.

[synu]

The next AIs will be trained on vast swathes of low-quality AI-generated outputs, if they are trained on public data again. Presumably people will have to come up with ways to work around that or the AI will be training to produce outputs like a low quality AI.

By low quality I just mean the state of the outputs today, which are incredible for what they are, but are definitely not the pinnacle of what is in theory possible.

[culi]

Anybody that uses these ai assistants know that the human is still by far the main architect and driver of the code base.

Increasingly advanced AI just means more back/forth between coder and AI, both increasing each other's velocity. AI won't just be trained on other AI-generated code, but more like "cyborg" code. Code that was made by both AI and human together. Code that the human probably wouldn't have been able to accomplish, at least not as quickly or in as much volume, without the AI

Rather than a singularity we might see a "multilairty" where both human and AI become increasingly useful to each other. A situation that takes full advantage of diversity in ways of thinking about and processing information/knowledge

[visarga]

You let the AI execute code, then it can learn. For now it is well read but lacks experience.