[jklm]

Relevant context - this was written by a member of the team who released the Twitter files, alongside Matt Tabibi.

[CharlesW]

Also, readers should know that The Free Press is Bari Weiss¹. Vanity Fair described her as "a provocateur", which is the kindest-possible interpretation of her editorial philosophy.

¹ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bari_Weiss

[cxf12]

And Vanity Fair is a pillar of concise and objective information?

Come on, at least be fair.

[kornhole]

And wikipedia bios of people challenging the narrative are also heavily censored and manipulated by the intelligence apparatus.

[EdwardDiego]

> In 2021, Weiss compared her own professional travails to Galileo Galilei, an Italian scientist who was threatened with being burnt at the stake if he did not renounce his scientific views.

Oh, wow.

[befeltingu]

Oh well if Vanity Fair says it then it must be so

[Fellshard]

Flagrant ad hominem is beneath this forum.

[Zpalmtree]

yep if they're saying stuff I don't like they're crazy and a provocateur, hey, maybe they're even a communist!

[refurb]

Edit: removed inflammatory comments

[jklm]

Not seeing how I did any discrediting, just thought it was interesting as I was reading through it. I intentionally wrote this in a neutral way - e.g. I could have just as easily mentioned John Carmack and Oculus.

Unless you believe that Matt Tabibi is not a reputable journalist or that the Twitter Files lack credibility, this feels like a very defensive gut response.

[flavius29663]

> insane conspiracy bullshit

If it's proven true, is it still conspiracy?

[the4aces]

Maybe the worst comment I have ever read on HN.