Dude reuses a private key all over the place and then throws a fit when someone gets it and takes his money. This is like wanting a lock company to give you money when you bought a new house, didn't change the locks, and the previous owner walked in and took the money from under your mattress.
And here we see why crypto cannot replace the real money system for mainstream consumers.
Real people reuse passwords. They forget passwords. They accidentally get a virus on their computer. They get tricked by fraudsters.
Crypto's main selling point- complete decentralization- means there is so fixing mistakes, no means to undo fraudulent transactions. Real people don't want that.
There's a lot of braindead crypto hate on HN, but these are very real and salient points.
I work in IT. I have to reset people's passwords after a 3day weekend. The other day, an employee typed their password into a phishing email because the real person they were emailing got compromised in the middle of their email exchange.
Crypto banking is simply a nonstarter for these people. There was an article on HN about how scammers cost 10B$ last year. A bank where mistakes are permanent and irreversible will never be mainstream.
So I know a victim of a phishing scam. She got tricked into confirming a transaction from her bank account. She called her bank minutes after it happened, but they told her that they are not able to reverse the transaction. However, according to them they are investigating if they can do something for her based on what they call "good will".
I don't understand where the bank analogies always come from. Crypto is not a bank. Holding crypto is like holding cash. If you put it under your bed and it's stolen, do you go to the government and complain about reverting the transaction?
If you want a third-party (bank) to secure your cash so you can do that with crypto, but then you're also exposed to the counterparty risk that comes with it. But that has nothing to do with crypto or fiat or whatever. If you don't trust yourself with managing the keys, put it on Coinbase or Kranken, centralized banks. If you want full control, put in your safe, i.e. manage your own key.
There are also decentralized alternatives that offer something in the middle, e.g. smart contract or social recovery wallets.
This is nothing new. Most are aware of the general issues with crypto currency security. Interesting comment from network code maintainer..
We maintain the blockchain, which facilitates the transactions, nothing more...
If we had to revert your funds, we would have to convince the entire ecosystem to roll back the blockchain, to prior the block that moved your funds, and every transaction made since along with it... Not only that, it would then be a matter of fight between you and the thief of who got the first transaction out of your wallet...
I created and operated some blockchains in the past. From experience I can confirm this attitude in this gh issue… people do no want decentralised chains where they are fully responsible for their own security. Knowing that if you’re extremely unlucky a pirate could even guess your seed. I suppose it’s also the reason why many users keep their money in managed wallets such as the ones of exchanges…
So… not sure why all the hype on cryptocurrency. It often doesn’t do what they advertise they do, and neither does the market want them to do it…
Money gotten through crime can (digitally) flow even through regular banks, see e.g Danske Bank, Swedbank and others in the Baltics. And locals will only start investigating when nudged by US government.
Money sans "managers" at the top is a system taking the long way to suicide. Money with incompetent managers is a ponzi scheme. Money with excellent management is a cult.
[+] [-] causi|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] andruby|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ls15|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mabbo|3 years ago|reply
Real people reuse passwords. They forget passwords. They accidentally get a virus on their computer. They get tricked by fraudsters.
Crypto's main selling point- complete decentralization- means there is so fixing mistakes, no means to undo fraudulent transactions. Real people don't want that.
[+] [-] shanebellone|3 years ago|reply
Ironically, if crypto was stable, it would better appeal to the general public. However, it would lose ground with its current user base.
The paradigm is incorrect. This generation of crypto will all, eventually, fail.
[+] [-] kryogen1c|3 years ago|reply
There's a lot of braindead crypto hate on HN, but these are very real and salient points.
I work in IT. I have to reset people's passwords after a 3day weekend. The other day, an employee typed their password into a phishing email because the real person they were emailing got compromised in the middle of their email exchange.
Crypto banking is simply a nonstarter for these people. There was an article on HN about how scammers cost 10B$ last year. A bank where mistakes are permanent and irreversible will never be mainstream.
[+] [-] detrites|3 years ago|reply
The solution for all these and crypto, is education.
[+] [-] nix23|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] potatototoo99|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] detrites|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ricardobeat|3 years ago|reply
> what's the problem with blocking it and returning the funds
> What's the point of seeing all existing transactions if they can't be stopped and reverted if stolen
Sounds exactly like the what the average person would think of crypto if it went mainstream.
[+] [-] janalsncm|3 years ago|reply
Or if a bug in the bank’s software meant you could lose your life savings.
Or if no transaction could be reversed, even in the case of obvious offline fraud?
All these things and more can be found in the incredible world of crypto.
[+] [-] ls15|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mudrockbestgirl|3 years ago|reply
If you want a third-party (bank) to secure your cash so you can do that with crypto, but then you're also exposed to the counterparty risk that comes with it. But that has nothing to do with crypto or fiat or whatever. If you don't trust yourself with managing the keys, put it on Coinbase or Kranken, centralized banks. If you want full control, put in your safe, i.e. manage your own key.
There are also decentralized alternatives that offer something in the middle, e.g. smart contract or social recovery wallets.
[+] [-] kybernetyk|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] puskavi|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] quickthrower2|3 years ago|reply
there you go
[+] [-] haasted|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bsdz|3 years ago|reply
We maintain the blockchain, which facilitates the transactions, nothing more... If we had to revert your funds, we would have to convince the entire ecosystem to roll back the blockchain, to prior the block that moved your funds, and every transaction made since along with it... Not only that, it would then be a matter of fight between you and the thief of who got the first transaction out of your wallet...
[+] [-] haint_|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] 2muchcoffeeman|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] gdcbe|3 years ago|reply
So… not sure why all the hype on cryptocurrency. It often doesn’t do what they advertise they do, and neither does the market want them to do it…
[+] [-] tjoff|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] TacticalCoder|3 years ago|reply
3% to 5% of the entire fucking world's GDP.
Cryptocurrencies are a tiny drop in the bucket. Tinier than tiny. Completely insignificant in the grand scheme of crime.
Organized crime existed way before Satoshi Nakamoto released Bitcoin to the world and shall, sadly, continue to exist long after that.
[+] [-] kreetx|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] terminal_d|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] asdz|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rasengan|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rouxz|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Beauford67|3 years ago|reply
[deleted]