(no title)
jlmb | 3 years ago
“Someone who works at Meta reached out and advised me to rename the filters asap.” [1]
So maybe the issue is simply that Pixelfed is using identical filter names.
jlmb | 3 years ago
“Someone who works at Meta reached out and advised me to rename the filters asap.” [1]
So maybe the issue is simply that Pixelfed is using identical filter names.
cowsup|3 years ago
Just rename the filters, and maybe make tweaks so they aren't exactly the same, and then suddenly Meta has no standing.
anthropodie|3 years ago
You may not have but that community is actually very active. I posted 5-6 photos on pixelfed and it had more engagement than my total Instagram engagement over 5-6 years.
zzzeek|3 years ago
This is Hacker News. OSS is supposed to be a good thing.
I just gave them $50, support creators, especially here where we are all benefiting as creators ourselves.
mschuster91|3 years ago
At the core, the problem is that the US doesn't have many protections for individuals and small businesses that need to fight against mega-corporations. It's simply infeasible to achieve anything outside of small-claims court. Europe is a bit better, but not by much.
faitswulff|3 years ago
binarymax|3 years ago
Good for them to call out bullying to spread awareness of their product.
jrnichols|3 years ago
https://github.com/pixelfed/pixelfed/pull/4037
themusicgod1|3 years ago
kitsune_|3 years ago
Juno, the ancient Roman goddess, a word in use for over 2000 years.
Clarendon, the wikipedia page at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clarendon lists approximately 40+ different uses, from place names to typefaces.
Lark, well, do I have to add anything here?
Ludwig, uhmmm, Beethoven's estate is about to be sued?
Lo-fi: Yes I never heard of this word before in the context of photography. True originators.
Please stop the trademarking of common words and cultural heritage that belong to all of us.
saurik|3 years ago
You can't just say "durrrr... I've heard this word before!" you have to actually show that that word has been connected to that context and isn't some otherwise unique usage, and I simply don't see how you are going to claim that for these words: if you show those filters to people and ask them to describe them, the only reason they would say "Clarendon" is because of Instagram's prior usage carefully associating that word with that filter behavior: if you believe otherwise you have to show THAT, not that the word itself has been uttered by someone in the past.
jdminhbg|3 years ago
brookst|3 years ago
Trademarks do not give someone the exclusive rights to that word in all contexts. Instead, you register a word or phrase and an category. For instance, there are about 1500 trademarks on the word Apple, from laundromats to eyeglasses[0]
But Meta’s complaint here doesn’t seem to be trademark; companies don’t typically trademark every name like filters. But there is lots of other IP law, including trade dress, which is different from trademark.
And much as I love the fediverse and hope it displaces dinosaurs like Meta, I’m surprised anyone would defending taking the filter names em mass and using them to refer to the same visual effects. That is not something one does. Meta is not claiming ownership of all uses of those words in any context, they are saying please don’t rip off the exact words to clone their UX.
[0] https://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=toc&state=4802%3A...
alphachloride|3 years ago
anthropodie|3 years ago
cronix|3 years ago
aendruk|3 years ago
kemayo|3 years ago
jamal-kumar|3 years ago
Honestly impressed as can be but can certainly see that they could have at least tried to differentiate it from its inspiration at least somewhat, like that's just poking bears in eyes with sticks.