(no title)
rinde | 3 years ago
Sounds like Europe to me. Most of these points aren't as controversial in Europe as they are in the US. Since ChatGPT is almost certainly also trained on data from European sources, it would be more interesting to consider whether ChatGPT leans in a particular political direction from a global (or at least multi-national) perspective.
mike_hearn|3 years ago
The idea that Europe (all of it) is politically homogenous and aligned with the US left seems quite prevalent on HN but it's not born out by actual polls. Europe is a big place with a lot of varying beliefs across its different countries and sub-regions.
Laaas|3 years ago
What I do agree on, is that the political climate is far more diverse than the US, but that's because there are more than 2 parties.
meowface|3 years ago
>While many of those answers will feel obvious for many people, they are not necessarily so for a substantial share of the population.
Personally, I agree with all of these answers and find them obvious. Whether or not the majority within certain regions is also in alignment, I think the article makes a fair point. In my opinion, it'd be better if it were more neutral and disinterested regarding its stances on political questions.
I predict the end result may be the opposite. Not unlike big media outlets, rather than one common neutral model we're probably just going to have a bunch of different biased models. As a dramatic example, GPT-4chan is a GPT-J model trained on three and a half years of posts from 4chan /pol/ and produces what you would expect (https://thegradient.pub/gpt-4chan-lessons/).
Although I doubt anything that extreme will become super mainstream, one could imagine right-leaning alternatives popping up largely as a response to OpenAI; both open and closed source. They'll probably be framed as "desanitized", "non-PC", "non-woke", or "uncucked" rather than "right-leaning".
rinde|3 years ago
giraffe_lady|3 years ago
This isn't a real thing though. Anything with impacts outside of your own living room is or can become a political question in certain contexts so this affects potentially everything. Ten years ago wearing a mask wasn't "political" now it is.
What is neutrality? What's the neutral position between genocide and don't? Between pacifism and conscription? The average view? Of who, taken when? There's no neutral ground from which to make these judgements. Even deciding what is "political" or what "neutral" means is itself a political act.
The value of neutrality is useful in some contexts but for this it is insufficient to solve any actual problem it presents.
peterashford|3 years ago
mardifoufs|3 years ago