top | item 34259866 (no title) benaadams | 3 years ago I feel the article violated Betteridge's law of headlineshttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge%27s_law_of_headline... discuss order hn newest HPsquared|3 years ago A better formulation would be "Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the null hypothesis.".That is, instead of "no", say "it's nothing". Kiro|3 years ago And many people here comment like it wouldn't. I guess you're so used to Betteridge's being true that you presume the answer in the article is "no".
HPsquared|3 years ago A better formulation would be "Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the null hypothesis.".That is, instead of "no", say "it's nothing".
Kiro|3 years ago And many people here comment like it wouldn't. I guess you're so used to Betteridge's being true that you presume the answer in the article is "no".
HPsquared|3 years ago
That is, instead of "no", say "it's nothing".
Kiro|3 years ago