top | item 34296148 (no title) garbagetime | 3 years ago I would say his work in linguistics is philosophy. discuss order hn newest implements|3 years ago In so far as “Philosophy is a language game” [1] then anyone who makes a significant contribution to linguistics also contributes to philosophy.[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language_game_(philosophy) lapcat|3 years ago You mean non-empirical? ;-) garbagetime|3 years ago Nope. His work on the questions of the nature of thought, language, and mind is both extremely influential & deeply philosophical.Some of his work on linguistics you can argue is not philosophy. Some I think clearly is. unknown|3 years ago [deleted]
implements|3 years ago In so far as “Philosophy is a language game” [1] then anyone who makes a significant contribution to linguistics also contributes to philosophy.[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language_game_(philosophy)
lapcat|3 years ago You mean non-empirical? ;-) garbagetime|3 years ago Nope. His work on the questions of the nature of thought, language, and mind is both extremely influential & deeply philosophical.Some of his work on linguistics you can argue is not philosophy. Some I think clearly is. unknown|3 years ago [deleted]
garbagetime|3 years ago Nope. His work on the questions of the nature of thought, language, and mind is both extremely influential & deeply philosophical.Some of his work on linguistics you can argue is not philosophy. Some I think clearly is.
implements|3 years ago
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language_game_(philosophy)
lapcat|3 years ago
garbagetime|3 years ago
Some of his work on linguistics you can argue is not philosophy. Some I think clearly is.
unknown|3 years ago
[deleted]