Sounds to me a lot like people that have a narrow and shallow level of experience in the field they are diving into, so they keep bumping into the walls.
Dev: I had this great idea of making this new thing because I haven't seen it before
Everyone Else: Yeah, it looks like this or this or even that. Have you looked at what other people have done and the pain points they solve or cause?
Dev: Nah, this is a totally different idea that nobody's done before.
As a graphics professional who loves node-based workflows, I find the constant re-invention of the wheel pretty painful. With some coordination of this effort, Blender or Natron could be real open-source challengers to Nuke, but starting from scratch seems always to be more enticing.
Based on replies in the subthread, I understand you mean that this obviously has been done many times before, and the authors didn't know, based on the naming. But let me offer a different perspective.
Gimel Studio looks exactly like what I was searching for. If I found out about it a month ago, I would hold off upgrading Affinity Photo to their newly released version 2, to get more layer-based non-destructive editing features, because Photoshop-style layer-based interface sucks (mostly it's too twiddly and requires too much high-precision mouse operations on a tiny side panel). I actually briefly looked for some 2D node-based image editors, and didn't find any. "Node based compositor" sounds like something from Blender or the film industry, so despite sort of being aware of this, it never occurred to me to search in this space.
Or, in short: for people like me, who are looking for software competing with GIMP, Photoshop, Affinity or Paint.NET, and not Blender or Houdini or whatever else VFX people use, "2D image editor" is obviously meaningful, "compositor" is not.
dylan604|3 years ago
Dev: I had this great idea of making this new thing because I haven't seen it before
Everyone Else: Yeah, it looks like this or this or even that. Have you looked at what other people have done and the pain points they solve or cause?
Dev: Nah, this is a totally different idea that nobody's done before.
Everyone Else: Oh, okay, you do you then
*I've been that dev (more than once)
doph|3 years ago
TeMPOraL|3 years ago
Whatever that is.
Based on replies in the subthread, I understand you mean that this obviously has been done many times before, and the authors didn't know, based on the naming. But let me offer a different perspective.
Gimel Studio looks exactly like what I was searching for. If I found out about it a month ago, I would hold off upgrading Affinity Photo to their newly released version 2, to get more layer-based non-destructive editing features, because Photoshop-style layer-based interface sucks (mostly it's too twiddly and requires too much high-precision mouse operations on a tiny side panel). I actually briefly looked for some 2D node-based image editors, and didn't find any. "Node based compositor" sounds like something from Blender or the film industry, so despite sort of being aware of this, it never occurred to me to search in this space.
Or, in short: for people like me, who are looking for software competing with GIMP, Photoshop, Affinity or Paint.NET, and not Blender or Houdini or whatever else VFX people use, "2D image editor" is obviously meaningful, "compositor" is not.