(no title)
throwawayoaky | 3 years ago
Still deciding if I buy it. only wants 1000 bucks a month to work on it full time, I think exploring the area is worth that at least.
throwawayoaky | 3 years ago
Still deciding if I buy it. only wants 1000 bucks a month to work on it full time, I think exploring the area is worth that at least.
Syntonicles|3 years ago
I hit page-down 40 times and wasn't even halfway through. I feel like billing $1000 to skim the proposal.
maydup-nem|3 years ago
I don't think there's an argument to be had for all structures, just that you can do it for each custom structure, and that's the point.
Maybe the editors of the old tried to bite off too much when they attempted embedded structures, and they didn't have the right abstractions in place. If you look at https://tylr.fun it shows that things that weren't being done back then, there are interesting approaches now.
some-mthfka|3 years ago
As for constraints and prototype OO: I think those will simply do great for GUI building, and for flexibility. I think you need such abstractions to be able to deal with customization and complexity of embedded structures. I am basing Fern on the Garnet GUI framework [1], which had ~80 projects and was pretty fun to use judging by what people say.
[1] http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~garnet/
PurpleRamen|3 years ago