[dontchooseanick]

Congratulations !

A documented, opiniated, non-hype biased post about AIs. I've lived the 80's AI hype wave and the fall that followed. AFAICT we're on the same train here.

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic" (Arthur C Clarke) and we're waiting for the masses to recognize what magic sparkles are : dust (ok, weighted barycenters of a huge database)

Side note : I often wonder how *GPT can deal with self-reference, like "What would you think of you if you were me ?" or "tell me something you were not programmed to think is plausible"

[p-e-w]

> I've lived the 80's AI hype wave and the fall that followed. AFAICT we're on the same train here.

Really? In the 80s they were trying to teach software to recognize handwritten numbers. Today, corporations are tightly controlling public access to large language models so they aren't used to manipulate elections and unhinge society.

That doesn't quite seem comparable to me. If anything, models like ChatGPT are underhyped because tech journalists mostly focus on stupid mistakes those models make in some situations.