80% now, 20% months later? Reminds me of Fractional Reserve Banking, where USA federal banks could invest 90% of deposited money, leaving only 10% of your savings "in savings".
Perhaps this explains the problems people have been having with Bank of America and being unable to withdrawal their money/paychecks. The money is no longer at the bank!
This really is nothing to do with and nothing like fractional reserve banking, and fractional reserve banking really is nothing like how it is frequently described on the internet in breathless tones. For people who are genuinely serious about understanding capital requirements for banks, I strongly recommend reading the Basel framework[1]. It’s not going to set your pulse racing but at least you won’t be recycling some “explanation” that has been made up by someone who doesn’t understand it themselves. And in point of fact as a sibling comment has pointed out, eliminating reserve requirements for deposits doesn’t eliminate capital requirements, which banks still have and are still in place.
nullish_signal|3 years ago
I just looked it up, and this seems to have dropped from 10% to 0% on March 15,2020, which "eliminated reserve requirements for all depository institutions" https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/reservereq.htm
Perhaps this explains the problems people have been having with Bank of America and being unable to withdrawal their money/paychecks. The money is no longer at the bank!
seanhunter|3 years ago
[1] https://www.bis.org/basel_framework/index.htm
unmole|3 years ago
jakehansen|3 years ago
Edit: Perhaps banks are infinite money machines, but what consequences do banks face that prevent them from writing blank checks?
raincom|3 years ago
unknown|3 years ago
[deleted]
granshaw|3 years ago
shmageggy|3 years ago
nigrioid|3 years ago