top | item 34465216

(no title)

toto444 | 3 years ago

The article points to a Twitter account named Two-Word Horror. I clicked on it not expecting much, it's actually quite disturbing.

Here are some examples :

> Riemann counterexamples

> Unicode Corporation

> Google Sex

> procedurally-generated regulations

> denim skin

> peak humanity

discuss

order

rogual|3 years ago

> Unicode Corporation

There is an Emoji Corporation [1], which as far as I can tell exists to try and trick people into thinking they've got to pay them to use emojis. Looks like they got some Danegeld out of Sony Pictures for the Emoji movie.

[1] https://www.emoji.com/

lcnPylGDnU4H9OF|3 years ago

First thought was how a big movie studio could be duped by that, especially for such a large project.

> We are the exclusive rights owner of the registered emoji® trademark

”We own the word and they used it!”

Playground logic from adults. Of course there are legitimate use-cases for a trademark but this is pretty plainly not one of those.

walrus01|3 years ago

> Facebook-Meta Landlord