top | item 34499664 (no title) mcmoebius | 3 years ago "wikipedia has biased opinions posing as facts"but yet to bolster your position, you link the brookings institute. lol discuss order hn newest verdverm|3 years ago The particular link does not have significant bias and is a good conversation despite where it is published. Wikipedia is plagued by manipulationPerhaps try reading it, make meaningful statements or comparisons to further the debate, and not end your rebuttals with a childish "lol"You're still engaging in shallow thinking otherwise
verdverm|3 years ago The particular link does not have significant bias and is a good conversation despite where it is published. Wikipedia is plagued by manipulationPerhaps try reading it, make meaningful statements or comparisons to further the debate, and not end your rebuttals with a childish "lol"You're still engaging in shallow thinking otherwise
verdverm|3 years ago
Perhaps try reading it, make meaningful statements or comparisons to further the debate, and not end your rebuttals with a childish "lol"
You're still engaging in shallow thinking otherwise