Video evidence may not be trusted as evidence in court in the future. Will we require something more perhaps? Or will the word of AI keen on spotting something's off be what we trust?
Has forensic analysis been defeated by a deep fake? At least in the courts cases won't depend on the jury being able to 'tell by the pixels' and instead experts will get called in. Whoever that ends up being, if they can do their job and authenticate a video at least as well as they already can with photoshops we should be fine.
Photoshop didn't cause society to collapse and photoshop-for-video won't either.
Maybe we will only trust video from cameras with embedded cryptographic functionality when the cryptographic checks verify it hasn't been tampered with?
(And even then sometimes wonder if a hardware hack was involved)
autoexec|3 years ago
Photoshop didn't cause society to collapse and photoshop-for-video won't either.
bryanrasmussen|3 years ago
the defense often cannot afford experts.
Also there is a long history of experts lying, in the U.S at least but I suppose elsewhere as well.
philipswood|3 years ago
(And even then sometimes wonder if a hardware hack was involved)