(no title)
citilife | 3 years ago
Where's the leverage? What theyre asking for is..
> so we walked—forgoing pay to fight for livable wages, codified diversity measures, and union security.
Oh boy...
> livable wages
I haven't seen the exact terms, but "livable wage" is often referred to, but very open ended. I'd never pay a person a "livable wage", I'd pay them fair market rate. Unfortunately, that's the reality. Most of the time, that's livable, but I cannot hire a 5 hour / week maid for a "livable wage", I hire them for the job they do.
This demand will push the company to use more contract labor IMO. There's hundreds of people looking for these roles / gigs, why deal with a union demanding rates higher than others would be willing to work for?
> codified diversity
This 100% of the time means incorporating some sort of "-ism" into the company. Might be an unpopular opinion in these parts, but the truth is that you cannot combat racism with racism. Setting up double-blind hiring practices might be possible or promotion boards, but in the end... it's more about culture and trying to look past physical traits (that said, fully support double-bling hiring/promotion methods).
In the end, the company might not legally be able to meet these demands. That said, many companies are doing illegal things like promoting based on race today.
> union security
Not sure what this means, but isn't this what union dues are supposed to cover?
toyg|3 years ago
Say bye to your limb: Hollywood is the poster child of unionization in an artistic field.
gadflyinyoureye|3 years ago
JustSomeNobody|3 years ago
Nobody is asking you to. This isn't what anyone, not one single solitary person, is asking. Unless you're also asking your maid to sign a non-compete.
What a ... poor poor example just to make a point.
> Oh boy...
Indeed