top | item 34587560 (no title) pifm_guy | 3 years ago I think no company should be allowed limited liability/bankruptcy protection.If a company can't pay its debts, the shareholders should be required to pay. discuss order hn newest JumpCrisscross|3 years ago > the shareholders should be required to payWe had this. For millennia. It simply makes equity impossible. Instead, you have proprietors who get loans--all investment is debt. chordalkeyboard|3 years ago > It simply makes equity impossible. Instead, you have proprietors who get loans--all investment is debt.this is not true. investors are merely incentivized to be more careful about who they trust with their money. load replies (1)
JumpCrisscross|3 years ago > the shareholders should be required to payWe had this. For millennia. It simply makes equity impossible. Instead, you have proprietors who get loans--all investment is debt. chordalkeyboard|3 years ago > It simply makes equity impossible. Instead, you have proprietors who get loans--all investment is debt.this is not true. investors are merely incentivized to be more careful about who they trust with their money. load replies (1)
chordalkeyboard|3 years ago > It simply makes equity impossible. Instead, you have proprietors who get loans--all investment is debt.this is not true. investors are merely incentivized to be more careful about who they trust with their money. load replies (1)
JumpCrisscross|3 years ago
We had this. For millennia. It simply makes equity impossible. Instead, you have proprietors who get loans--all investment is debt.
chordalkeyboard|3 years ago
this is not true. investors are merely incentivized to be more careful about who they trust with their money.