top | item 34628468 (no title) webjunkie | 3 years ago Agreed. What is it with everyone wanting to see Chat GPT only in the light of accessing information and then complaining about it? discuss order hn newest starkd|3 years ago Because thats what you do to evaluate it as a service? brookst|3 years ago It makes me wonder if these people have ever talked to a real person before. Spoiler: real people can be wrong too! ceejayoz|3 years ago Real people take longer to be wrong. The potential volume one bad actor can generate matters; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gallop is a dangerous enough technique when someone has to actually physically come up with the bullshit."Gish gallop as a service", essentially. mahathu|3 years ago You can trust your friends to not straight up make up facts when they don't know something, like Chat-GPT does, for example.
brookst|3 years ago It makes me wonder if these people have ever talked to a real person before. Spoiler: real people can be wrong too! ceejayoz|3 years ago Real people take longer to be wrong. The potential volume one bad actor can generate matters; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gallop is a dangerous enough technique when someone has to actually physically come up with the bullshit."Gish gallop as a service", essentially. mahathu|3 years ago You can trust your friends to not straight up make up facts when they don't know something, like Chat-GPT does, for example.
ceejayoz|3 years ago Real people take longer to be wrong. The potential volume one bad actor can generate matters; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gallop is a dangerous enough technique when someone has to actually physically come up with the bullshit."Gish gallop as a service", essentially.
mahathu|3 years ago You can trust your friends to not straight up make up facts when they don't know something, like Chat-GPT does, for example.
starkd|3 years ago
brookst|3 years ago
ceejayoz|3 years ago
"Gish gallop as a service", essentially.
mahathu|3 years ago