What they don't seem to be talking about is learning from indigenous farming communities who use things like diversity in crops and rotation to keep soil quality high. These problems were solved decades ago, just not by the industrial farming community
tengbretson|3 years ago
codingdave|3 years ago
algoatecorn|3 years ago
refurb|3 years ago
unknown|3 years ago
[deleted]
ilostmyshoes|3 years ago
kortilla|3 years ago
AlotOfReading|3 years ago
I actually did napkin math awhile back comparing a particular 16th century indigenous agricultural yields with 20th century American agriculture [0]. The indigenous system came out favorably until the second half of the 20th century despite the limitations of hand tools and natural fertilizer. There's still a gap between that and current yields, but I think it's fair to point out that most advocates of these systems are actually arguing for a synthesis with modern technologies that allow them to scale rather than a complete rejection of modernity.
[0] https://reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/l4do8a/aztec_cor...
willcipriano|3 years ago
hedgehog|3 years ago
lotsofpulp|3 years ago
randomdata|3 years ago
Scoundreller|3 years ago
Hugely mechanized though which makes it work when you have enough crop land. But yeah, $/hectare yield is going to be low.
peteradio|3 years ago
tnel77|3 years ago
sleton38234234|3 years ago
mattpallissard|3 years ago
Crop rotation has been standard practice my entire life. One of the many kickers though is soybeans are the fallback crop for really wet springs. Many crops need to be planted by a certain date or the growing season will be too short. Soybeans can "make up for lost time", so to speak. If your first planting gets flooded, or if it's too wet to get any crop in, you can wait until it's dry and toss in some soy to recoup some of the cost. Thing is soybeans use a lot of nitrogen.
> And you also need lots of organic matter
Manure spreaders are still a thing.