People talk most about CO2 because it has the most total effect as a driver of climate change. CH4 for example has a greater effect per kilogram, but we emit a lot less of it and it doesn't last nearly as long.
H2O technically affects the temperature even more than CO2 but it's not a driver, because the total H2O in the atmosphere depends on overall temperature. Emitting more H2O, from hydrogen cars or something, would just mean you get more rain somewhere.
sokoloff|3 years ago
DennisP|3 years ago
H2O technically affects the temperature even more than CO2 but it's not a driver, because the total H2O in the atmosphere depends on overall temperature. Emitting more H2O, from hydrogen cars or something, would just mean you get more rain somewhere.
blululu|3 years ago
specialist|3 years ago
And it's very likely any fixes will not simply be a matter of reducing atmospheric carbon.
Here's a first principles explanation for why carbon net zero and sequestration are not the direct, most expedient path towards reducing temps.
"Dr. Ye Tao on a grand scheme to cool the Earth" https://www.volts.wtf/p/volts-podcast-dr-ye-tao-on-a-grand#d...
TLDR: Given the time and resources we have, focus on strategies for cooling the atmosphere the fastest way possible.