(no title)
6c737133 | 3 years ago
all they're proving is that tests, and interviews, are bullshit constructs that merely attempt to evaluate someone's ability to retain and regurgitate information
6c737133 | 3 years ago
all they're proving is that tests, and interviews, are bullshit constructs that merely attempt to evaluate someone's ability to retain and regurgitate information
AussieWog93|3 years ago
All people see is the cheating, and possibly this scary new AI that's going to get smarter than humans in a short period of time.
I suspect the best way to educate people on both the powers and limits of the technology is to get them to sit down for 15 minutes with it.
alchemist1e9|3 years ago
When you call it dumb, what do you mean? Can you give some examples?
Please don’t give computational examples we all already understand it does inference and doesn’t have floating point computational capabilities or reasoning, and so many give such examples for some silly reason.
biql|3 years ago
pixl97|3 years ago
The problem with people is we keep pushing it to "Only AGI/machine superintelligence is good enough". We are getting models that behave closer to human level. The 'doesn't know everything, is good at somethings, and bullshits pretty well'. Yea, that's the average person. Instead we raise the bar and go 'well it needs to be a domain expert in all expert system' and that absolutely terrifies me that it will get to that stage before humanity is ready for it. This is not going to work well trying to deal with it after the fact.
unknown|3 years ago
[deleted]
brhsagain|3 years ago
Also, I think this is a bit overstated. Programmers (and smart people in general) like to think that their real job is high level system design or something, and that "mere regurgitation" is somehow the work of lesser craftsmen. When in reality what GPT shows is that high-dimensional regurgitation actually gets you a good fraction of the way down the road of understanding (or at least prediction). If there is a "buried lede" here it's that human intelligence is less impressive than we think.
newfocogi|3 years ago
lostmsu|3 years ago
No, all they are proving is that either tests are bullshit constructs, or ChatGPT is human-level.
fdgsdfogijq|3 years ago