top | item 34671174 (no title) bungle | 3 years ago But on the other hand he is suspect, until convicted (probabilities, who cares, system does not work by probabilities). discuss order hn newest mr_00ff00|3 years ago Right he is a suspect regardless if it’s for hacking or extortion.We don’t call him a hacker because he hasn’t been convicted. Your statement seems to miss the point of the parent comment. bungle|3 years ago What point? That we should not call convicted extortionist a hacker? I sure agree with you, but we (outsiders) should not call unconvictected (regardless of their previous history) people a hacker or extorsionist either. load replies (1) yencabulator|3 years ago "alleged extortionist"
mr_00ff00|3 years ago Right he is a suspect regardless if it’s for hacking or extortion.We don’t call him a hacker because he hasn’t been convicted. Your statement seems to miss the point of the parent comment. bungle|3 years ago What point? That we should not call convicted extortionist a hacker? I sure agree with you, but we (outsiders) should not call unconvictected (regardless of their previous history) people a hacker or extorsionist either. load replies (1)
bungle|3 years ago What point? That we should not call convicted extortionist a hacker? I sure agree with you, but we (outsiders) should not call unconvictected (regardless of their previous history) people a hacker or extorsionist either. load replies (1)
mr_00ff00|3 years ago
We don’t call him a hacker because he hasn’t been convicted. Your statement seems to miss the point of the parent comment.
bungle|3 years ago
yencabulator|3 years ago