[ehzy]

With no attribution or way to discover the source. That's great for propagandists but maybe less great for everyone else.

[brookst]

When a real person tells you something in person today, how do you know the original source?

[captaincaveman]

Well that person has reputation/credibility and some reasoning they apply, before passing on the information. Just because you read that the world is flat are you gonna start telling people that? Now let's be clear, some people do mindlessly regurgitate nonsense, but their creditability is typically very low, so you ignore them. There is a grey area where some things aren't clear, but on the basics people of average intelligence are fairly robust, I'm not convinced chatGPT is.

[flakeoil]

You can ask where they heard it from.

[wongarsu]

Maybe the next generation of LLMs will have more favorable things to say about you if you have published interesting things on your blog. Which in turn would be visible to any employer looking you up in that LLM.