(no title)
leot | 3 years ago
The tech has already been proven—carriers just need to be mandated to add it because there's no business reason to do so.
leot | 3 years ago
The tech has already been proven—carriers just need to be mandated to add it because there's no business reason to do so.
arcticbull|3 years ago
People say that but in the decades since it was thought up mesh networks have never actually managed to work, not at any scale. Routing efficiently is extremely complex especially when all the nodes keep moving around. I concede it may be better than nothing in an emergency but I strongly suspect it's just not very useful in general, which is probably why carriers haven't mandated it. After all if it worked you wouldn't need carriers at all, yet here they are...
Karrot_Kream|3 years ago
In situations without access to a fat, centralized link or situations where resilience is more important than bandwidth or latency, mesh networks are a great choice. Emergencies are such situations but remote areas or low power needs are other situations suited for mesh networks.
genewitch|3 years ago
> After all if it worked you wouldn't need carriers at all, yet here they are...
It'd work fine in more dense areas. Probably not the higher band 5G stuff, but lower bands and 4G. There's no carrier incentive to do this, that's why OP said "mandated".
RF_Savage|3 years ago
Especially the infrastructure-less TETRA DMO Direct Mode Operation for ad-hoc communications with the trunking infrastructure down, out of range or over capacity.
And everybody in the Public Safety radio space seems to always laugh when LTE Direct is brought up. Apparently poorly specified and adopted by no vendors.
ISL|3 years ago