(no title)
bwindels | 3 years ago
One example: a thing often overlooked is the efficiency of the onboard charger, which can incur a loss of up to 32% on for example the Renault Zoe [1].
1: https://www.lachaineev.fr/ ( french )
bwindels | 3 years ago
One example: a thing often overlooked is the efficiency of the onboard charger, which can incur a loss of up to 32% on for example the Renault Zoe [1].
1: https://www.lachaineev.fr/ ( french )
comte7092|3 years ago
Taxing battery weight is a better method in this instance, because wear is directly proportional to vehicle weight.
floxy|3 years ago
Road wear is proportional to the fourth power of axle weight:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_power_law
1970-01-01|3 years ago
Tax (curb - battery) weight then? So we can afford the 1000km vehicles we all say we need, while penalizing the heaviest and most inefficient EVs.
linkjuice4all|3 years ago
Ideally this would encourage lighter vehicles to cut down on the initial “weight” tax as well as increase efficiency of the vehicle overall (more miles per kilowatt hour).
There’s obviously going to be a lot of headaches for farm use vehicles and people generating their own power and paying a tax on it but how else do you pay for roads and incentivize people to stop driving gigantic vehicles?