top | item 34714958 (no title) jdhn | 3 years ago >and not who is benefited by the destruction of the pipeline.The article itself said that Norway would benefit from the destruction of the pipe line. discuss order hn newest indymike|3 years ago > The article itself said that Norway would benefit from the destruction of the pipe line.This does not make the article more credible, in fact, it detaches the beneficiary one more degree from the actor. lenkite|3 years ago You can check the increase in energy exports from the US and Norway after the Nordstream sabotage yourself.. jeltz|3 years ago Wouldn't that imply that Norway did it?
indymike|3 years ago > The article itself said that Norway would benefit from the destruction of the pipe line.This does not make the article more credible, in fact, it detaches the beneficiary one more degree from the actor. lenkite|3 years ago You can check the increase in energy exports from the US and Norway after the Nordstream sabotage yourself..
lenkite|3 years ago You can check the increase in energy exports from the US and Norway after the Nordstream sabotage yourself..
indymike|3 years ago
This does not make the article more credible, in fact, it detaches the beneficiary one more degree from the actor.
lenkite|3 years ago
jeltz|3 years ago