I've asked this before, but is having a domain name with someone else's business name in it allowed? The answer I was given last time was you can buy it it but you might not get to keep it. Still, I can't help but think it would be inevitable legal trouble.
100% chance that stackoverflow will be sending nasty notes to the author (who appears to live in the US). 100% chance he'll have to take it down or change the name.
You really can't use the exact name of the people you are cloning. Even something like "stackrobot" would risky. Safest thing is to not use any words from the original product.
The owner of a simple hobby project like this, without SEO or sign-in or whatsoever, probably don’t need to care so much to protect his domain. If StackOverflow asks for his domain he can just give it away and set up the site at a new domain name.
If they have the motivation/resources to go through the process, no- even a branding like “staqoverflow” would be infringement if they engage in the same type of activity as the trademark registration.
Complicated question because it os
trademark law. “AppleBakeryChicago” probably doesn’t have to worry about Apple Inc suing them. In the case of this site they should be worried.
There are a lot of soft clones of SO that you encounter at times with the exact same questions and answers in a crappier display format. Missed opportunity to whoever copped https://stackgpt.com, I foresee something like that coming eventually.
Lol just yesterday I saw an eight year old answer on SO neatly solving my problem, except the API was hallucinated. Humans have been hallucinating APIs for far longer.
Whether it's AI generated, or some random schlep on Stack Overflow - Don't trust the answer without reviewing. Amateurs run code they don't understand.
Part of the challenge of StackOverflow is finding the question that matches your situation. But that is a pointless act with ChatGPT -- just ask it your exact question. Duplicates be damned.
Slight off topic question: this is a browser addon too; does being installed as a browser addon enable any security risks? Do browser addons/extensions get access to all browser traffic?
I see various software as browser addons/extensions... is that a security loophole?
They can get access to all browser traffic if they're configured to. They can also be configured for activation only on specific sites. It really depends.
I don't get this hate-boner HN has for SO. Have you tried being active there? It's super easy to not have your question closed, just do the minimum amount of effort. And if you're active, you'll see the thousands of similar questions arrive every day. If you're active in the review queues, you will see all the spam, broken answers, non-SO fitting questions etc. people churn out.
I see people complain about how their "well researched and well articulated question got closed" all the time, but when prompted no one every actually provides a link to their question. Which makes me believe it actually just was a low effort noisy question after all..
If anything, HN is much more snarky, just look at the comments on anything here.
Everybody got what they wanted and it’s much “nicer” now (it won’t even let you comment “what have you tried?” anymore, for instance). Wouldn’t you know it, the front page is now full of low-quality, low-effort questions.
This just feels like the wrong way around, I go to stackoverflow for stuff chatgpt can't answer. If anything, the right tool would be something which turns chatgpt threads into a stackoverflow question. (I don't actually think that is a good idea, just that it would make more sense)
Stack overflow gives you more than the answer, it gives you multiple answers for variations on what the OP wanted and therefore more options to try out. I guess this is useful when there are zero options provided or only crappy ones.
motoxpro|3 years ago
rvnx|3 years ago
"Top StackOverflow expert on XX", so the incentive is still there.
One solution to spam could be to keep the voting system, but not publicly reward users with points (like on HN).
dustyharddrive|3 years ago
noduerme|3 years ago
klyrs|3 years ago
Edit: come to think of it a Markov generator would probably be better on the question end so the hallucinated answers have more work to do.
balls187|3 years ago
herpderperator|3 years ago
slyall|3 years ago
You really can't use the exact name of the people you are cloning. Even something like "stackrobot" would risky. Safest thing is to not use any words from the original product.
lancefisher|3 years ago
This process may vary based on the TLD. For The Channel Islands, you can start here: https://disputes.gg/
IANAL
nkozyra|3 years ago
nonethewiser|3 years ago
renonce|3 years ago
primitivesuave|3 years ago
quickthrower2|3 years ago
dubcanada|3 years ago
andsoitis|3 years ago
idkwhoiam|3 years ago
iKlsR|3 years ago
slenk|3 years ago
oefrha|3 years ago
tjbiddle|3 years ago
nonethewiser|3 years ago
TheDudeMan|3 years ago
Part of the challenge of StackOverflow is finding the question that matches your situation. But that is a pointless act with ChatGPT -- just ask it your exact question. Duplicates be damned.
Jipazgqmnm|3 years ago
llagerlof|3 years ago
auditor_3d|3 years ago
demivoleegaston|3 years ago
unknown|3 years ago
[deleted]
sdfhbdf|3 years ago
ab-dm|3 years ago
CatWChainsaw|3 years ago
wombatpm|3 years ago
bsenftner|3 years ago
I see various software as browser addons/extensions... is that a security loophole?
speculator|3 years ago
hobabaObama|3 years ago
ilt|3 years ago
gailees|3 years ago
lcnPylGDnU4H9OF|3 years ago
Seriously, I think it means questions which don’t yet have community answers.
ChrisMarshallNY|3 years ago
matsemann|3 years ago
I see people complain about how their "well researched and well articulated question got closed" all the time, but when prompted no one every actually provides a link to their question. Which makes me believe it actually just was a low effort noisy question after all..
If anything, HN is much more snarky, just look at the comments on anything here.
emodendroket|3 years ago
dpkirchner|3 years ago
jshobrook|3 years ago
pharmakom|3 years ago
unknown|3 years ago
[deleted]
jjallen|3 years ago
brap|3 years ago
unknown|3 years ago
[deleted]
personjerry|3 years ago
mrleinad|3 years ago
unknown|3 years ago
[deleted]
sam_goody|3 years ago
(And, while I wouldn't ever install this, good to see that FF is still on the charts)
unknown|3 years ago
[deleted]
TT-392|3 years ago
quickthrower2|3 years ago
unknown|3 years ago
[deleted]
tomgs|3 years ago
https://stackoverflow.com/a/75397146/491214
mcintyre1994|3 years ago
unknown|3 years ago
[deleted]
fhckmsbd|3 years ago
[deleted]
devlife|3 years ago
meghan_rain|3 years ago