(no title)
savryn | 3 years ago
LOL thanks for posting this,
I love-hate this part, this is the state of things
------
Galloway then wants reassurance about his first big art purchase,
Saltz pseudo-approves, saying, Well despite all your self-loathing you perfectly bought a painting that represents you
(Swisher is dead wrong, this response is masterfully tactful in the most New York way, brilliant)
How much did it cost, he asks, 6K?
Gallawoy says to add a zero and laughs nervously...
Then he adds, well the artist of the painting is just so stunning and brave and really he bought it to support the artist and all they represent...
So I look up the artist, it's Grayson Perry and I guess google images is enough said
MDIIAMDIRuined
god if this is what a 'sincere' purchase feels like, well i guess the hedgefunders don't seem so bad
-------------
Ironically, modern art is the one field that I do not think it's wise to 'separate the art from the artist' without losing most of the magic, whereas films, music, books etc the works feel like contained mini-worlds, can be transmitted as complete, stand alone.
Modern paintings don't have the 'density' for that without the story/aura, so getting the right work with the right story to unlock it for you can feel really special.
(That ineffable specialness is what you're really buying imo, and yes it very well can be worth it)
----------
p.s. My favorite easy-to-read book for cynics trying to understand why 'who the artists is' matters so much in the 'aura' of art is The Accidental Masterpiece, by Saltz's competitor haha, Michael Kimmelman of nytimes
his short essays capture the 'essence' of different types of minds at work. A decade later I'll randomly think of the people from the book, tho I can't remember their names or the paintings per se. The feeling of exactly who I'm thinking of sticks with you.
Everyone who makes things probably wonders how other types of people make things, since it feels impossible to describe.
No comments yet.