(no title)
kyeb
|
3 years ago
I'd be super interested to see an analysis using exactly the same methodology as this performed on various other cities (SF, NYC, LA, maybe some European cities like Amsterdam or Cologne) for comparison. I would bet Seattle is near the top for the US in walkability (probably behind NYC only)
tobiasdorge|3 years ago
98codes|3 years ago
Seattle doesn't make the top 133 for densest census designated places in the US*
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_cities_b...
hiidrew|3 years ago
honestly surprised that SF is more walkable than NYC with this criteria
tomtheelder|3 years ago
I’ve lived in both and if you’re sort of near the core then NYC is much, much more walkable than SF.
Aunche|3 years ago
powersnail|3 years ago
At least it isn't like San Jose or Newark, where sidewalks just aren't there along some roads, in residential area, or suddenly cut short in the middle of a block where you have to walk back to the previous crossing for an alternative route. And there are _so many_ dead ends without warning. So many.
ackfoobar|3 years ago
I wonder if NYC will rank higher if Staten Island is excluded. Not that I have anything against it, just that judging from the heat map it is less walkable than the rest.
It's similar in Canada too. Toronto is the megacity (1998 amalgamation) including some suburbs; Vancouver does not include Richmond; Montreal has weird holes like Westmount.
ghaff|3 years ago
petetheheat|3 years ago
...starts to question list.