[nszceta]

It does make sense to completely cripple critical infrastructure initially with plausible deniability.

Combine this with the Ohio derailment and the uncaught substation snipers which knew an awful lot about what equipment to take out.

Derailment is a powerful sabotage tool. Americans were caught attempting it in Russia years ago. https://tass.com/politics/1313063

They are trying to weaken infrastructure by making taxpayers bleed time, money, and effort.

[ianburrell]

A nuke isn’t plausible deniability. They, and the balloon, can be tracked back to source.

Someone in another post was worried about balloons dropping bombs. Guided glide bomb would be pretty effective. But the balloon isn’t stealth. As we’re seeing, even small objects can be tracked by radar. Also, bombs are heavy and that means a large balloon. Something the size of the ground visible spy balloon.

Infrastructure is more resilient than you think. I doubt there is a spot where a single bomb could cripple things. If there was, a ground bomb would be effective and easier.

[ttyprintk]

The continuous monitoring today makes even underground tests attributable to certain counties. We can tell when the North Korean announcement of a nuclear test happened to not coincide with even vanishingly small amounts of radioxenon.

And, forensically, what’s left behind after an explosion tells the design and mix of fissile material, which tells you the level of resources available to the maker.

[nszceta]

> can be tracked back to source

Not sure I believe that it can be done beyond a reasonable doubt. I still don't see what evidence there is that these things are Chinese. It's probably speculation and nothing more. It might still be true, but the attribution is likely highly speculative.