[jsnk]

At least in the Western developed world, discrimination against less attractive people is probably the most potent, most prevalent and least acknowledged discrimination in the society.

It is most potent because this happens at almost every human interaction from trivial (getting help at a store from the staff) to important (selecting a husband or a wife).

It is most prevalent because this happens across all races, religions and sexes without any inhibition. Other than the old adage, "don't judge book by its cover." people judge others based on looks all the time and feel justified in doing so. There's not even a word like racism, sexism, anti-X or X-phobia for discrimination against less attractive people.

It is least acknowledged because as you mentioned, there's no one who would like to join the "ugly" identity group. There's no commonly shared root like race, religion, sex, or ethnicity. And identifying oneself as "ugly" probably hurts the person more than it can help.

It is unfortunate that there's no foreseeable solution to this wide spread problem at all, other than voluntary empathy from the society in general. But at the same time, that may be the most important antidote to any discrimination we face rather than top-down rule of law change.

[dragonwriter]

> At least in the Western developed world, discrimination against less attractive people is probably the most potent, most prevalent and least acknowledged discrimination in the society.

It’s prevalent and potent, but it is extremely widely acknowledged. The degree to which it is seen as problematic is more variable ("discrimination", in and of itself, is simply having a factor influence a decision, and is not universally viewed as problematic.)

> There’s not even a word like racism, sexism, anti-X or X-phobia for discrimination against less attractive people.

Yes, there is, and the word is “lookism”. [0]

> It is least acknowledged because as you mentioned, there’s no one who would like to join the “ugly” identity group.

“Ugly” isn’t an identity group. Discrimination can happen on literally any basis (every basis on which a decision is made is “discrimination”), not only by identity groups.

[0] https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/lookism#:~:text=o....

[s1artibartfast]

what about discrimination against stupid people? It seems like that would top discrimination for appearance.

[jsnk]

Not gonna lie. That hasn't occurred to me, but that is a pretty grave discrimination as well.

It might be even more insidious because there's a strong justification that stupid people are stupid because of their own volition. However, in reality, there's element of intelligence that's purely genetic and there's nothing a person can do.

[dragonwriter]

> what about discrimination against stupid people?

It is also very common, but also very frequently is discrimination that goes to the core of the overt purpose of the decision being made. As discrimination is simply having any factor play into a decision, the usual problem is with (1) decisions whose motivation is to cause harm to a group, or (2) decisions in which factors like membership in a group are weighed that are not germane to the overt non-malicious purpose, which cause an (unwarranted by the purpose) adverse impact on the group.