err, I maybe hugely mistaken but is this an example of a real life of the following joke:
"a scientist had this experiment going wherein everytime he rung a bell the grasshopper would jump. He clips one of the grasshopper's legs and rings the bell to see if the grasshopper would still jump and it did. He repeated the clipping process till the grasshopper had no legs. He wondered if it would still jump ... and it did not. He muttered to himself that hence that proves grasshoppers use their legs to hear"am wondering it this is an example of a teleological thinking?
phirus|3 years ago
amatic|3 years ago
Maybe the name of the strategy should be "directed random walk".
ars|3 years ago
kilgnad|3 years ago
Given zero information about your surroundings other then the fact of whether you are currently in a shade or currently not in a shade traveling in a straight line is a mathematically better strategy.
Why? Because random walk includes the possibility of going back to the same place of where there is no shade while traveling in a straight line guarantees every move is a new location.
ilija139|3 years ago
jacquesm|3 years ago
Not quite, but the location of the grasshoppers hearing organ is actually quite close to the legs!
DonaldFisk|3 years ago
dotancohen|3 years ago