top | item 34795908

(no title)

mgreenw | 3 years ago

Yea that's fair, and I totally understand when sites limit to newer (last 2-3 years) versions of browsers or limit to Chrome, Safari, and Firefox.

But to cap it at just Chrome like its 2012 when browser compatibility has come such a long way is likely unnecessary and frankly lazy on their part. I can't think of an API that they definitely would need to use that isn't in Firefox.

discuss

order

anaxag0ras|3 years ago

Exactly. There's no excuse, a "unicorn" company with millions of users such as Snapchat can surely do better.