[ihusasmiiu]

From my experience and for the music I listen to, Discogs has much more detail compared to Musicbrainz.

I think a good 50% of my local music is missing from Musicbrainz.

When the release is present, almost always it's missing different issues for the same release (e.g. the white label test pressing release, the final release, the restamp from 20 years later). Discogs almost always has all of them.

Discogs includes lot of useful information: is that specific release single sided? Was it pressed on acetate rather than normal vinyl? What had it etched on the runout?

[aerozol]

The Discogs ‘schema’ doesn’t attempt to solve any issues brought up in the article.