top | item 34877314

(no title)

coda_ | 3 years ago

And they never say if the amount includes equity in your home. (The video didn't say in this case but I couldn't read the article)

discuss

order

phkahler|3 years ago

I would say owning your home free and clear is a prerequisite to retire. Rent or payments on debt are often our biggest expenses. Retirement is possible only when passive income is enough to cover expenses.

davidgay|3 years ago

> I would say owning your home free and clear is a prerequisite to retire.

People in countries like Switzerland with a high percentage of renters (58%) somehow manage to retire...

americafun|3 years ago

Hum, no?

I would say a prerequisite for safe retirement is to have enough to buy a home outright in cash, otherwise mortgages will weigh you down like a stone:6% interest on a 1 million gbp loan in the UK is unpayable for majority of people even in London and yet you wont find anything worth buying there below that price.

Also we should stop saying a house has equity: it doesn't. You are a paying off a loan for a commodity. A house is like a car or groceries: necessary, yes, but not an investment, unless its luxury. This is how we exploded house prices.

HyperSane|3 years ago

It might be possible someone is using home equity loan for leverage.

bagacrap|3 years ago

huh? why is it impossible for passive income to cover a mortgage?

Simon_O_Rourke|3 years ago

Exactly, depending on the house that's another 500k to 2M, and takes a bigger chunk out of their argument.