Nonsense. Inside the global warming field there are loads of different models and predictions and intense debate about different ideas.
There are some outlier models that are ignored by other scientists because of their bad faith assumptions and methodology but that's true of many fields of science like quantum physics and cosmology.
Wrong. Scientists trying to get funding for projects exploring things like the impact of sun radiations on earth climate, have a very hard time because of the political rules that are enforced in terms of what's allowed to be looked at and what's not.
Scientists are also tired of arguing about the reality of evolution, perpetual motion mechanisms, flat earth, a non-plate techtonic earth and maybe other settled matters. Try to get a research fellowship for flat earth or perpetual motion and see just how ruthlessly science cuts down dead ideas. Or maybe now in Florida you can get a flat earth fellowship, the Republicans certainly seem eager to remove the benefits of our scientific learnings as fast as they can.
Scientists choose to argue about things like did Eukarya evolving from Archaea?Imagine having interesting debates about that [0] and then having some numpty tell you that evolution doesn't exist at all.
badcppdev|3 years ago
There are some outlier models that are ignored by other scientists because of their bad faith assumptions and methodology but that's true of many fields of science like quantum physics and cosmology.
icare_1er|3 years ago
lanstin|3 years ago
badcppdev|3 years ago
0 - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096098222...