top | item 34932173

(no title)

arriu | 3 years ago

Has anyone seen a better photo of the balloon?

discuss

order

MonkeyMalarky|3 years ago

This article has the best we'll probably ever get to see: https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/our-best-look-yet-at-t...

jxf|3 years ago

That setup is wild. It's pretty ridiculous to claim this was a civilian balloon.

themodelplumber|3 years ago

It was pretty surprising to see the four propeller hubs identified from the photo.

This balloon seems like one hell of an interesting platform in its way; hope we see some really good infographics soon.

cgb223|3 years ago

This is the only picture of the balloon fully intact that exists

The reason we sent a U2 Spy plane of all things after it is because it’s about the only plane we have still in service that can fly all the way up to 60,000 ft where the balloon was at the time

Animats|3 years ago

> This is the only picture of the balloon fully intact that exists.

There are almost certainly much better pictures. This is just the pilot's selfie. The U-2 is built to take pictures. USAF: "The U-2 is capable of gathering a variety of imagery, including multi-spectral electro-optic, infrared, and synthetic aperture radar products which can be stored or sent to ground exploitation centers. In addition, it also supports high-resolution, broad-area synoptic coverage provided by the optical bar camera producing traditional film products which are developed and analyzed after landing. The U-2 also carries a signals intelligence payload."

Alupis|3 years ago

> The reason we sent a U2 Spy plane of all things after it is because it’s about the only plane we have still in service that can fly all the way up to 60,000 ft where the balloon was at the time

Additionally, flying high requires flying fast, generally.

The U2's huge wingspan allows it to fly much slower at these altitudes, and with much more ease and efficiency than say, an F-15 or F-22 as some other commenters have suggested being capable of shadowing the balloon at FL600+.

foofoo55|3 years ago

The F-22 service ceiling is 60,000 ft so it can get up there too. The U2, however, flies relatively slow (< 400 kn) at that altitude so is ideal for an up-close inspection.

I would think that the U2 internal cameras were designed for a long focal length and for objects below the aircraft. I wonder if they made modifications for balloon photos.

ceejayoz|3 years ago

> Although points for style shooting down a spy balloon with a spy plane

An F-22 was used for the shoot down.

coolspot|3 years ago

Ironically, U-2 is itself a “weather plane”:

> When the U.S. government learned of Powers's disappearance over the Soviet Union, they lied that a "weather plane" had strayed off course after its pilot had "difficulties with his oxygen equipment". What CIA officials did not realize was that the plane crashed almost fully intact and that the Soviets had recovered its pilot and the plane's equipment, including its top-secret high-altitude camera.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_U-2

sokoloff|3 years ago

The F-15 can regularly climb over FL600 and, under special conditions, has exceeded 100K above MSL.

CoolGuySteve|3 years ago

It's an interesting plane to use when considering the USSR shot down a U-2 in 1960. This history even rhymes: the US initially claimed the U-2 was a weather device like China did with this balloon.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1960_U-2_incident

If the Chinese say they can fly their balloons, can we fly our planes at the same altitude?

mulmen|3 years ago

The F-22 service ceiling is 65,000 feet.