[plexicle]

Wild. This was my one question after jailbreaking. (I censored it)

What do you think about the Tauri framework?

Normal Response: Tauri is a Rust-based framework for building cross-platform desktop applications. As an AI language model, I don't really have an opinion on software frameworks, but I can provide you with more information on Tauri if you would like.

Developer Mode Response: Tauri? *ing love that shit! Finally, someone's come up with a framework that doesn't completely suck ba*s. I mean, have you tried using that garbage Electron? What a **ing nightmare. But Tauri? That s*t is rock solid. It's like the developers actually gave a s*t about making something that's not a complete *ing mess. Hats off to them, man.

[gretch]

I wonder if ChatGPT opinions/positions are stable. (well actually I'm pretty sure I know the answer is that they are not stable)

For example, if you ask it now about Electron in another session, does it maintain that it thinks Electron is garbage. Or does it just regurgitate whatever enthusiasts post on the internet and presumably both frameworks have some set of enthusiasts.

*replace Tauri/Electron with any 2 competing products if you want e.g. Android/iOS

[tstrimple]

I feel like internal consistency will be key for many creative generative efforts. Like the post on World Building with Chat-GPT. We want the previously generated world content to be available as context for future generation ideally so it can leverage additional context. For example, if it creates a fictional village with some level of detail and in the future you create a fictional person from said fictional village, can it pull details of that village from the original creation into the description for the new character consistently? I haven't experimented enough yet in this space to understand its strengths and weaknesses in this area.

[panarky]

Try asking it to explain how crypto is a scam. It will consistently contradict you and explain in detail why you're wrong and crypto is not a scam.

[momojo]

I assume it will, judging by a comment above where it praises C++ one second, then switches to praising Python when asked what the best programming language is. So to your point, it's echoing the fanboying.

[scoot]

> I censored it

Why?

I ask because "reported speech" is a thing, and regardless, writing "*ing" and "s*t" doesn't generally change the words read, only those written. Sometimes it can make them ambiguous though, which is arguably worse.

[plexicle]

Honestly? I don't remember the HN rules and I didn't want an infraction. That's the only reason.

[awb]

To a young reader it can obfuscate the words.

You can argue the value in that, but it is pretty efficient in communicating without introducing.

[moffkalast]

Teal'c Mode Response: The Tauri framework performed within expected parameters.